# multi-threading **URL:** \ **Category:** Classic Servoy\ **Created:** [November 29, 2004, 8:38pm UTC](https://forum.servoy.com/t/multi-threading/3160 "2004-11-29T20:38:01Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Harjo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex010/user_avatar/forum.servoy.com/harjo/32/4873_2.png) [@Harjo](https://forum.servoy.com/u/Harjo)\ **Post date:** [November 29, 2004, 8:38pm UTC](https://forum.servoy.com/t/multi-threading/3160/1 "2004-11-29T20:38:01Z")
Hi, is it possible in the future to start a method, in another thread? I now have a method which sends over 10.000 emails per month, which is not a high performance job for the processor, but a time consuming one. It would be nice, if I could start the method in another thread, so I could work further in my same solution, without opening another session! Is this somewhere on the whislist? ---
**Author:** ![jwservoy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/8491ac/32.png) [@jwservoy](https://forum.servoy.com/u/jwservoy)\ **Post date:** [December 4, 2009, 2:13pm UTC](https://forum.servoy.com/t/multi-threading/3160/2 "2009-12-04T14:13:55Z")
Has multi-threading functionality been implemented in Servoy? This would be a huge benefit!!! ---
**Author:** ![patrick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/b2d939/32.png) [@patrick](https://forum.servoy.com/u/patrick)\ **Post date:** [December 4, 2009, 2:15pm UTC](https://forum.servoy.com/t/multi-threading/3160/3 "2009-12-04T14:15:49Z")
Ui! That’s gonna be wild. Two threads accessing records in a foundset etc. Let’s all hope you all know what your threads are doing ![:-)]( "Smile") ---
**Author:** ![jcompagner](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex010/user_avatar/forum.servoy.com/jcompagner/32/4889_2.png) [@jcompagner](https://forum.servoy.com/u/jcompagner)\ **Post date:** [December 7, 2009, 1:52pm UTC](https://forum.servoy.com/t/multi-threading/3160/4 "2009-12-07T13:52:40Z")
in 5.1 we will be introducing the headless client plugin where you can order it to just process the 10K emails on the server which is a way better thing to do then do that in a client.