Servoy 6.1 rc 4

Classic Servoy
21

Rossen,

A related issue was fixed after rc4, fixing also this one.

Rob

rossent:
Hi Servoy,

In 6.0.6 we could bind fields using 2-hop relations - for example, on a form based on table A we could place a field with a dataprovider set as: A_to_B.B_to_C.some_column

In 6.1 RC4 such bindings are still possible (at least the UI in the Servoy Developer allows it) but at runtime no data is displayed in fields or labels which use more than 1-hop relations like the one described above. Is this a bug or an intentional change? Are such bindings supported by Servoy in 6.1?

22

lvostinar:

studiomiazzo:
I understand, thank you. Do you think I have to switch to the TableView for my purpose?

Yes, in 6.0 Web Client the listview is actually a tableview.

That’s fine but we’ve got a little problem: we need to hide the table’s headers. Is there any automatic way of doing so?
Also, do you know why the listview should get those bunch of pixel shifted on the left? We’ve got a checkbox for multiple selection, could it be it?

23

studiomiazzo:

lvostinar:

studiomiazzo:
I understand, thank you. Do you think I have to switch to the TableView for my purpose?

Yes, in 6.0 Web Client the listview is actually a tableview.

That’s fine but we’ve got a little problem: we need to hide the table’s headers. Is there any automatic way of doing so?
Also, do you know why the listview should get those bunch of pixel shifted on the left? We’ve got a checkbox for multiple selection, could it be it?

for the pixels shifted on the left, we need to see your form layout, can you show it
in a sample solution ?

24

studiomiazzo:

lvostinar:

studiomiazzo:
I understand, thank you. Do you think I have to switch to the TableView for my purpose?

Yes, in 6.0 Web Client the listview is actually a tableview.

That’s fine but we’ve got a little problem: we need to hide the table’s headers. Is there any automatic way of doing so?

Yes, add header part.

25

Many thanks