changes to omit function
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:03 pm
Apparently, changes were made to the omit function in 3.1 such that records that are omitted stay omitted even after the next find:
Is there a way to work around this? And please explain why this change to omit functionality is a good thing. I find it counter-intuitive, but realize that somebody thinks otherwise, and would appreciate knowing why, and how I might use it to my advantage.
Thanks,
Jim
http://forum.servoy.com/viewtopic.php?p=38971&sid=494a2df12b48a1e8fdca8ae0e7bfb752
Is there a way to work around this? And please explain why this change to omit functionality is a good thing. I find it counter-intuitive, but realize that somebody thinks otherwise, and would appreciate knowing why, and how I might use it to my advantage.
Thanks,
Jim