Required 8.3 filenaming convention?

Questions and answers regarding general SQL and backend databases

Required 8.3 filenaming convention?

Postby Westy » Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:27 pm

In the Servoy Developer Volume 1 - Users Guide on page 497 it states:
IMPORTANT: If you are creating an iAnywhere database as a service on Windows 2000, make sure that you use the 8.3 naming convention...

Is this true, or should it say Windows NT? Long file and folder names seem to work fine on the Windows 2000 Workstation PC that I am using for testing purposes. If anyone can clarify this I would greatly appreciate it.
Westy
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 5:27 am
Location: Lynnfield, Massachusetts USA

Re: Required 8.3 filenaming convention?

Postby mnorman » Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:00 pm

Westy wrote:In the Servoy Developer Volume 1 - Users Guide on page 497 it states:
IMPORTANT: If you are creating an iAnywhere database as a service on Windows 2000, make sure that you use the 8.3 naming convention...

Is this true, or should it say Windows NT? Long file and folder names seem to work fine on the Windows 2000 Workstation PC that I am using for testing purposes. If anyone can clarify this I would greatly appreciate it.


Dean,

You are correct that Windows 2000 in most instances does support long
file and folder naming (up to 256 characters).

However, prior to the current release of Servoy 2.1.2, we had a number
of developers who reported experiencing problems when creating a
database as a service on Windows 2000 - when the naming of their
database was did not follow the 8.3 naming convention required for
earlier versions of Windows.

Based on our subsequent testing to confirm the existence of this bug, we
added this note in the current documentation.

_____________
Marc Norman
Servoy
mnorman
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 8:50 pm
Location: Alturas, CA

Postby Westy » Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:19 am

After some more testing on Windows 2000 Professional, I have found that short folder names are sometimes needed when running a bat file. At this point I am not clear on whether the short names themselves are needed or whether using short names is just fixing command lines that would otherwise be too long.
Westy
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 5:27 am
Location: Lynnfield, Massachusetts USA

Postby Harjo » Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:26 pm

We had a lot of problems with Windows 2000 server icm, with Sybase.
If you want to install the sybase services in a windows 2000 server, than pay attention to the doc's and name-conventionm or else it won't work!
Harjo Kompagnie
byKom B.V.
ServoyCamp
Servoy Certified Developer
Servoy Valued Professional
SAN Developer
Harjo
 
Posts: 4321
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:42 pm
Location: DEN HAM OV, The Netherlands


Return to SQL Databases

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests